Executive Summary
Artificial intelligence is changing the economics of software development—and with it, the economics of IT outsourcing. AI-assisted coding, testing, documentation, and automation are changing how engineering work is performed and where development value is created.
A 2026 Management Science study involving 4,867 developers at Microsoft, Accenture, and a Fortune 100 company found that developers given access to an AI coding assistant completed 26.08% more tasks on average (Cui et al., 2026). But if developers can accomplish more with AI, will companies simply need fewer developers—and therefore less offshore development capacity?
Not necessarily. AI does not affect every engineering activity equally. As routine execution becomes increasingly AI-assisted, architecture, complex integration, domain knowledge, product judgment, security, and human oversight become relatively more important. The question is therefore shifting from how many developers a company needs to what combination of talent, AI capability, and delivery model creates the greatest value.
This article examines how that change could reshape offshore team structures, pricing, and engagement models—and what it means for the future economics of IT outsourcing.
Introduction
For decades, the economics of IT outsourcing and offshore software development have been relatively straightforward. Companies outsource software development to access technical talent, expand engineering capacity quickly, reduce development costs, and gain specialized capabilities that may be difficult or expensive to build internally.
The offshore software development model strengthened this equation further. Companies could build dedicated development teams or Offshore Development Centers (ODCs) in lower-cost markets while accessing increasingly sophisticated technical skills. As demand increased, capacity could often be expanded by adding developers. In simple terms, more development work generally meant more engineering resources.
AI is beginning to challenge that relationship.
Evidence already suggests that AI in software development can materially increase output in some engineering environments. A 2026 Management Science study found a 26.08% increase in completed tasks among developers given access to an AI coding assistant (Cui et al., 2026). Yet the impact is far from uniform. In a randomized study of experienced open-source developers working in mature codebases they knew well, METR found that early-2025 AI tools actually increased task-completion time by 19% (Becker et al., 2025). METR subsequently cautioned that newer AI tools appear more capable, while also noting that measuring their true productivity effect has become increasingly difficult (Becker et al., 2026).
These apparently conflicting results reveal something important: AI productivity cannot be reduced to a single percentage. Its value depends on the task, developer experience, codebase, development environment, AI tool, and how work itself is organized.
That matters enormously for IT outsourcing.
If AI increases productivity in some software development activities but not others, the future of offshore software development cannot be understood simply as “fewer developers.” Businesses need to reconsider which work should be outsourced, what skills an offshore team should contain, how large that team should be, how AI should be integrated into delivery, and which offshore development model creates the greatest value.
The economics of IT outsourcing are therefore beginning to move beyond a simple equation of labor cost × headcount × billable hours. The emerging question is how human expertise, AI-enabled productivity, offshore cost advantages, and the right software development outsourcing model combine to create business value.
Why Companies Outsource Software Development — and What AI Changes
The business case for IT outsourcing has never been based on cost alone. Deloitte’s 2024 Global Outsourcing Survey of more than 500 executives found that access to skilled talent and greater agility now sit alongside cost reduction as key drivers of outsourcing, with 80% of executives planning to maintain or increase investment in third-party outsourcing (Deloitte, 2024).
For software development outsourcing, the value proposition is therefore broader: lower development costs, access to technical and specialized talent, faster team expansion, greater flexibility, and the ability to scale engineering capacity without building everything in-house. Offshore software development strengthens this model further by combining these advantages with geographic cost differences.
Traditionally, however, scaling software delivery has remained closely tied to scaling people:
More software demand → More engineering capacity → More developers → More development cost
Different offshore development models address this need in different ways. IT staff augmentation provides additional resources and skills. Dedicated development teams and Offshore Development Centers (ODCs) provide longer-term engineering capacity and knowledge continuity. Project-based outsourcing transfers responsibility for delivering a defined scope to the service provider. Despite these differences, additional development capacity has largely meant adding human resources.
AI introduces a new variable into this equation: engineering productivity.
If AI-assisted software development enables engineers to complete parts of coding, testing, debugging, documentation, and maintenance faster, software output may no longer need to grow at the same rate as engineering headcount.
The equation begins to change:
More software demand → Human expertise + AI-enabled productivity + the right offshore development model → More development output
This does not necessarily weaken the business case for IT outsourcing. Instead, it may change where the value of outsourcing comes from. Cost efficiency remains relevant, but technical expertise, AI-enabled productivity, domain knowledge, scalability, and delivery capability may become increasingly important.
The question, then, is not simply whether AI means fewer offshore developers. It is which parts of software development AI can materially change—and how those changes reshape the economics of offshore software development models.
How AI Is Changing Software Development Productivity
AI in software development is moving rapidly into the mainstream. DORA’s 2025 research found that 90% of technology professionals were already using AI at work, while more than 80% believed AI had increased their productivity (DORA, 2025).
But faster coding does not necessarily mean proportionately less engineering work.
DORA found that AI-assisted software development can accelerate initial code generation, but some of the time saved is subsequently redirected toward auditing and verifying AI-generated output. Its research also indicates that AI can improve software delivery performance when supported by strong development practices, while weak underlying systems and processes can limit those gains (DORA, 2025).
This distinction matters for IT outsourcing. Software engineering extends far beyond producing code. Architecture, complex integration, security, requirements interpretation, testing, product judgment, and quality assurance continue to depend heavily on context and human expertise.
AI may therefore change the composition of software engineering work rather than simply eliminate it:
Less routine coding → More capacity for architecture, verification, integration, and higher-value engineering work
For offshore software development, this changes the productivity equation. The value of an offshore team may increasingly depend not simply on how many developers it provides, but on how effectively it combines engineering expertise with AI-assisted development.
The economic question is therefore moving beyond “How much does a developer cost?” toward a more important measure:
How much valuable software can an AI-enabled engineering team reliably deliver?
How AI Changes the Economics of Offshore Software Development
The traditional economics of offshore software development have largely been built around two variables: the cost of engineering talent and the amount of engineering capacity required.
AI adds a third: the productivity of that capacity.
At first glance, the implication appears simple. If AI enables developers to produce more, an offshore development team may need fewer people to deliver the same amount of software. But emerging evidence suggests the economics are more complicated.
Research on AI-assisted programming found that productivity improvements were concentrated among less-experienced developers, while experienced developers carried more of the review and maintenance burden. Following GitHub Copilot adoption, experienced core developers reviewed 6.5% more code while their own original-code productivity declined by 19% (Xu et al., 2025).
This points to an important change in offshore team economics: AI may not simply reduce team size. It may change the composition of the team.
Routine implementation can increasingly be supported by AI, while architecture, code review, integration, security, domain understanding, and technical decision-making place greater value on experienced engineers. An AI-enabled offshore development model may therefore require a different balance of senior expertise, execution capacity, and automation rather than simply fewer developers.
The traditional offshore equation:
Lower labor cost × More developers = Cost-efficient capacity
may gradually evolve toward:
Engineering expertise × AI-enabled productivity × Offshore cost advantage = Higher-value delivery
This also changes how companies should evaluate IT outsourcing costs. Comparing hourly developer rates alone becomes less meaningful if two offshore teams with the same headcount produce significantly different levels of reliable software output.
The more relevant economic measure becomes the cost of achieving the required development outcome—not simply the cost of each developer assigned to it.
For offshore software development providers, that creates both an opportunity and a challenge. Providers that use AI merely to reduce effort while continuing to sell headcount capture the productivity benefit themselves. Providers that translate AI productivity into faster delivery, stronger engineering capability, or better commercial outcomes can create value that is shared with the client.
This distinction will increasingly influence which offshore software development model makes economic sense.
How AI Is Reshaping Offshore Software Development Models
AI will not affect every offshore software development model in the same way. The impact depends largely on what the client is buying: individual capacity, a dedicated team, a defined project, or responsibility for an outcome.
Gartner argues that AI is already challenging outsourcing models built primarily on labor and location arbitrage and pushing the market toward more outcome-driven, AI-orchestrated services. Importantly, Gartner also cautions companies against simply converting AI productivity gains into premature headcount reductions; instead, outsourcing agreements should create transparent mechanisms for measuring productivity and sharing the value created (Gartner, 2026a; Gartner, 2026b). Gartner
The implications differ across the major IT outsourcing models:
| Offshore development model | Traditional value | How AI changes the economics |
|---|---|---|
| IT staff augmentation / RaaS | Add developers or specialized skills when needed | AI can increase the output of each resource, making productivity and capability increasingly important alongside hourly rates |
| Dedicated development team / ODC | Build stable, scalable offshore engineering capacity | AI can change team composition, potentially allowing a different mix of senior expertise, development capacity, QA, and automation |
| Project-based outsourcing | Provider delivers a defined scope for an agreed price | AI productivity can reduce delivery effort and time, giving efficient providers greater opportunity to improve speed, margin, or client value |
| Managed services | Provider assumes responsibility for an ongoing service or capability | AI enables greater automation, making service levels, productivity, and measurable outcomes more important than the number of people assigned |
| Outcome-based outsourcing | Client pays against agreed results | AI becomes part of the provider’s delivery leverage, while commercial value becomes less directly connected to headcount or hours |
The biggest pressure may fall on pure headcount economics. In a traditional staff augmentation model, increasing capacity usually means adding more billable resources. If AI enables the same engineering team to deliver more, however, headcount alone becomes a weaker measure of value.
That does not mean IT staff augmentation or Offshore Development Centers will disappear. For many companies, access to flexible engineering capacity, specialized talent, long-term product knowledge, and direct control over development priorities will remain valuable. Deloitte’s 2026 analysis similarly describes emerging sourcing strategies as a combination of internal capabilities, global delivery centers, AI, and next-generation managed services rather than a wholesale replacement of one model by another (Deloitte, 2026).
What changes is the economic question.
Instead of asking only:
How many developers do we need, and what is the hourly rate?
companies may increasingly ask:
Which offshore development model gives us the right combination of engineering capability, AI productivity, control, scalability, and accountability?
This is where AI begins to reshape IT outsourcing at a structural level. The competitive advantage of offshore software development may gradually move from providing lower-cost engineering capacity toward providing more productive engineering capability.
Does AI Reduce the Offshore Cost Advantage—or Make It Stronger?
If AI reduces the amount of human effort required to develop software, it raises an obvious question for IT outsourcing: does lower engineering effort make the traditional offshore cost advantage less valuable?
The productivity potential is significant. McKinsey estimates that generative AI could create productivity value equivalent to 20–45% of current software-engineering spending. In its developer experiments, code documentation was completed in half the time, new code in nearly half the time, and code refactoring in roughly two-thirds of the time (McKinsey, 2023).
But individual task efficiency and enterprise productivity are not the same thing.
McKinsey reported in 2025 that most organizations deploying generative AI coding tools at scale had achieved less than a 10% improvement in team productivity. By contrast, its study of nearly 300 public companies found that the highest-performing AI-enabled software organizations achieved 16–30% improvements across productivity, customer experience, and time-to-market, together with 31–45% improvements in software quality (McKinsey, 2025).
The difference matters. The economic value of AI in software development appears to depend not simply on access to AI tools, but on how effectively companies redesign development processes, roles, platforms, and ways of working around them.
This creates two competing effects for offshore software development.
First, AI can weaken pure labor arbitrage. If fewer engineering hours are required to produce a given output, the financial benefit of simply purchasing those hours at a lower offshore rate becomes less important.
Second, AI can strengthen the economics of a capable offshore team. AI development tools are globally accessible. An offshore engineer can combine the same class of AI tools with an already competitive cost base. If the offshore development partner also has strong architecture, engineering practices, domain expertise, and delivery capability, the client can potentially benefit from both cost efficiency and higher productivity.
Importantly, higher productivity does not automatically mean proportionately fewer developers. Gartner reports that AI-enabled teams are already saving approximately five hours per employee per week, yet concludes that current productivity gains are not sufficient to assume net job reductions. The more important opportunity is how that released capacity is redirected toward higher-value work (Gartner, 2025).
The traditional offshore value equation therefore begins to change:
Traditional offshore advantage = Lower cost per engineering hour
toward:
AI-enabled offshore advantage = Competitive cost base + Engineering capability + AI productivity + Delivery performance
This changes how companies should evaluate offshore software development costs. Hourly rates remain relevant, but they tell only part of the story. A lower-cost team that requires more time, more rework, or greater client supervision may ultimately be more expensive than an AI-enabled team that delivers reliable software faster.
The more meaningful economic measure is therefore shifting from the cost of engineering capacity toward the total cost—and business value—of software delivery.
AI may not eliminate the offshore cost advantage. It may redefine what makes that advantage valuable.
From Selling Developers to Selling Engineering Capability
For decades, much of IT outsourcing has been commercially structured around a simple unit: engineering capacity. A client needs additional software development capability, the provider supplies developers, and pricing is calculated through monthly resource rates, FTEs, or billable hours.
AI does not make this model irrelevant. But it can expose one of its economic limitations: the commercial unit being purchased—developer time—is not necessarily the same as the value the client ultimately needs—software delivery.
This distinction becomes more important as AI increases the amount of work an engineering team can potentially perform.
Gartner expects generative AI to play an increasingly significant role across software engineering and projected that by 2028, 75% of enterprise software engineers would use AI code assistants, up from less than 10% in early 2023 (Gartner, 2024).
At the same time, the commercial structure of outsourcing is beginning to evolve. Deloitte’s outsourcing research describes a broader move beyond traditional cost-focused outsourcing toward sourcing ecosystems combining external talent, technology, automation, specialized capabilities, and managed services. Organizations increasingly expect providers to contribute transformation and business value rather than simply supply lower-cost resources (Deloitte, 2024).
AI intensifies this change because different commercial models distribute productivity gains differently.
Consider an offshore team that can deliver the same amount of reliable software with 20% less engineering effort. The business value of that improvement depends heavily on how the engagement is structured.
Under a traditional time-and-materials or staff augmentation model, fewer hours can mean lower revenue for the provider if the productivity gain is passed directly to the client. If the client continues purchasing the same capacity, however, that productivity can instead be used to deliver more features, reduce backlog, improve testing, or accelerate releases.
Under a fixed-price project, the economics are different. If AI enables the provider to deliver the agreed scope with less effort while maintaining quality, the provider can retain more of the productivity benefit through improved margins—or use it strategically to offer faster delivery or more competitive pricing.
Under a managed-service or outcome-based model, the relationship can move further away from engineering inputs. The client pays increasingly for service levels, deliverables, capabilities, or agreed business outcomes, while the provider determines how human expertise and AI should be combined to achieve them.
This creates an important commercial question for the next generation of IT outsourcing:
Who captures the economic value created by AI productivity—the client, the outsourcing provider, or both?
The answer should not automatically be “the provider.” Nor should every productivity improvement automatically result in lower headcount and lower fees. Gartner argues that sourcing agreements need mechanisms that recognize AI-driven productivity improvements while avoiding simplistic assumptions that productivity gains should translate directly into resource reductions (Gartner, 2026).
A more mature outsourcing relationship can use AI productivity in several ways: reducing delivery cost, increasing development output, accelerating time-to-market, improving software quality, or releasing engineering capacity for more complex work.
This suggests a broader evolution in the value proposition of offshore software development:
Headcount → Capacity → Capability → Delivery → Business Outcome
These stages should not be interpreted as a prediction that one outsourcing model will replace another. A company that needs five specialist engineers integrated into its internal product organization may still be best served by staff augmentation. A business building a long-term offshore engineering function may still prefer an ODC or dedicated development team.
What AI changes is the basis on which those models can be evaluated.
The strongest offshore development proposition may increasingly be not “we can provide developers at a lower rate,” but “we can combine the right engineering talent, AI tools, technical leadership, and delivery model to create more value from every dollar of software development spending.”
That is a significantly different competitive proposition—and it moves offshore software development from selling access to labor toward selling engineering capability.
How to Choose an Offshore Software Development Model in the AI Era
Choosing the right offshore software development model has traditionally depended on cost, required skills, project duration, scalability, and the level of control a company wants to retain. AI adds another factor: how engineering productivity and delivery responsibility are distributed between the client and the IT outsourcing provider.
This matters because AI is not replacing outsourcing. Deloitte’s 2024 Global Outsourcing Survey of more than 500 executives found that 83% are already using AI within outsourced services, while 80% plan to maintain or increase investment in third-party outsourcing (Deloitte, 2024).
Instead, AI changes the economics of the major software development outsourcing models.
IT staff augmentation / RaaS works when companies need flexible access to software developers or specialized skills while retaining control over product, architecture, and delivery. As AI-assisted software development increases individual productivity, engineering capability becomes increasingly important alongside hourly rates.
Dedicated development teams / Offshore Development Centers (ODCs) are better suited to businesses that need long-term offshore development capacity, scalability, and knowledge continuity. AI can change the optimal team structure, increasing the importance of senior engineering expertise, domain knowledge, architecture, and technical leadership.
Project-based software development outsourcing works when scope and deliverables can be clearly defined. Because the client purchases delivery rather than individual engineering hours, the outsourcing provider has greater incentive to use AI and automation to improve development speed and efficiency.
Managed services and outcome-based outsourcing shift greater delivery responsibility to the provider. Gartner argues that AI-enabled outsourcing agreements should increasingly consider transparent, outcome-oriented commercial frameworks and mechanisms for sharing productivity gains rather than assuming that AI efficiency should automatically translate into headcount reductions (Gartner, 2026).
The choice of IT outsourcing model can therefore begin with one question:
What does the business actually need to buy—engineering resources, development capacity, project delivery, or an outcome?
From there, companies should evaluate the required level of control, technical expertise, scalability, AI capability, delivery accountability, and governance.
AI does not eliminate existing offshore development models. It makes selecting the right offshore software development model for the work increasingly important—and shifts the decision beyond simply comparing developer rates.
Conclusion
AI is not eliminating IT outsourcing. It is changing what makes offshore software development valuable.
Cost and access to talent still matter, but the competitive advantage is shifting toward a stronger combination:
Engineering expertise + AI productivity + Offshore cost efficiency + The right delivery model
For businesses, the question is no longer simply “Where can we find developers at a lower cost?” It is “Which offshore software development model can deliver the greatest value from our technology investment?”
For IT outsourcing providers, the opportunity is equally clear: move beyond selling headcount and build AI-enabled engineering capability that delivers faster, better, and more measurable outcomes.
Ready to Build an AI-Enabled Offshore Development Team?
Romulus Digital helps businesses access experienced engineering talent in Vietnam through IT staff augmentation, dedicated development teams, Offshore Development Centers (ODCs), and custom software development.
Talk to Romulus Digital about the offshore development model that fits your business.
References
Becker, J., Rush, N., Barnes, B., & Rein, D. (2025). Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity. Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR).
Becker, J., Rush, N., Cunningham, T., Rein, D., & Mahamud, K. (2026). We Are Changing Our Developer Productivity Experiment Design. Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR).
Cui, K. Z., Demirer, M., Jaffe, S., Musolff, L., Peng, S., & Salz, T. (2026). The Effects of Generative AI on High-Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00535
Cui, K. Z., Demirer, M., Jaffe, S., Musolff, L., Peng, S., & Salz, T. (2026). The Effects of Generative AI on High-Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00535
Deloitte. (2024). Global Outsourcing Survey 2024: How Much Disruption Can You Take? Deloitte.
Deloitte — Global Outsourcing Survey 2024
Deloitte. (2024). Global Outsourcing Survey 2024: Multidimensional Sourcing — Orchestrating the Extended Workforce Ecosystem. Deloitte.
Deloitte. (2026). The Power of a Multidimensional Workforce: Outsourcing for Strategic Advantage. Deloitte, April 2, 2026.
Deloitte — Outsourcing for Strategic Advantage
DORA. (2025). State of AI-assisted Software Development 2025. Google Cloud / DORA.
DORA — State of AI-assisted Software Development 2025
DORA. (2026). Balancing AI Tensions: Moving from AI Adoption to Effective SDLC Use. DORA.
DORA — Balancing AI Tensions
Gartner. (2024). Gartner Says Generative AI Will Require 80% of Engineering Workforce to Upskill Through 2027. Gartner.
Gartner — Generative AI and the software engineering workforce
Gartner. (2025). Forget Layoffs: AI Is Coming for Inefficiency, Not People.
Gartner. (2026). How AI Is Changing Outsourcing Agreements. Gartner.
Gartner — How AI Is Changing Outsourcing Agreements
Gartner. (2026a). AI Agents Reshape IT Outsourcing: Implications for CIOs and Sourcing Leaders. Gartner, February 10, 2026.
Gartner — AI Agents Reshape IT Outsourcing
Gartner. (2026b). How AI Is Changing Outsourcing Agreements. Gartner, March 3, 2026.
Gartner — How AI Is Changing Outsourcing Agreements
McKinsey & Company. (2023). The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier.
McKinsey & Company. (2023). Unleashing Developer Productivity with Generative AI.
McKinsey & Company. (2025). Triple the Return: How Companies Can Get More from Enterprise Tech.
McKinsey & Company. (2025). Unlocking the Value of AI in Software Development.
Xu, F., Medappa, P. K., Tunç, M. M., Vroegindeweij, M., & Fransoo, J. C. (2025). AI-Assisted Programming Decreases the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing the Technical Debt and Maintenance Burden. Tilburg University / SSRN.
